|
Sep 04, 2010 - 06:14 PM
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Main MenuOnline
There are 1 unlogged user and 0 registered users online.
You can log-in or register for a user account here. |
The claim last week by a Russian submarine to “own” the Arctic Ocean, and the North Pole, plus Russia's stated renewal of flying military missions with airplanes in both a “spying” and “offensive mode” posture are both worrisome and deplorable. One nation cannot claim a whole ocean or region, and the Arctic should have the same status as the Antarctic – shared by everyone, owned by no one, agreed upon by treaty amongst all the nations of the planet. Russia’s increased belligerency in military areas – new unlimited production of planes, missiles, tanks and artillery; withdrawing from the CFE treaty; apparently planning to build an ABM system; and perhaps in the process of considering, as has the United States, the idea of militarizing space – is not a welcome behavior to most of the planet. These are formulas for disaster. Russia is not threatened by anyone as best as can be ascertained. Their paranoia has once again reached to a level of political insanity. Muscle alone will not make Russia a player on the world stage, nor will being a major oil producer, although the latter could make them rich, and provide the Russian populace (and not just the elites and the oligarchs) with a level of economic self-sufficiency not available to the Russian masses ever *if* all this new wealth isn’t devoted to just military development and hardware. Russia has some severe problems. The irradiated areas where nuclear arms production has occurred, the enormous pollution and waste problems left to them by the former Soviet state (and to the 14 breakaway republics) are really big issues apparently being ignored by a leadership hell bent on remilitarization. In the past, and one of the many reasons the Soviet state collapsed, was this overemphasis on military hardware and large standing armies. If Putin really wants to go backward, or “return to Soviet glory,” he risks a confrontation not only with the US, but NATO and Asia, mostly China. I suspect most of the world will be quite uneasy about a Russia determined to bully its neighbors, and resume authoritarianism at home (the latter being *quite* sad as a developing process). The 21st century *should* be an era of promise and cooperation, especially in the areas of environmental concerns and world trade. Russia, China and the US all continue with agricultural subsidies, keeping the “third world” locked out of agricultural trade. Russia and the US continue to the largest purveyors of arms across the planet while with crocodile smiles offering cries of woe about the distance of peace in Kurdistan, Spain, Russia, the Middle East and the Philippines to name just a few examples. Both Russia and the US threaten to use, or do use, force to get what they want. This is a long step away from cooperation, as are the behaviors of rearming and spurious land grabs. The dangers of a second “Cold War” grows closer, and almost no one is giving a great deal of attention to the matter, from the very top where it is being either actively promoted (Putin) or ignored completely (Bush and the West). The United States’ adventurism in Afghanistan and Iraq, the promotion of such against Iran (Cheney) and Pakistan (Obama) seem the height of folly, but then that could also be said about the Russian claim to “own” all of the Arctic, and the apparent unleashing of a “new” round of rearmament with all of its attendant dangers. VMS Note: Written Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:14:14
|
| An online community for VAL-L subscribers |