|
Sep 04, 2010 - 05:42 PM
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Main MenuOnline
There are 1 unlogged user and 0 registered users online.
You can log-in or register for a user account here. |
Here's a place in the world most of us, myself included, have not given much attention to and, in light of recent events, that perhaps we should be watching more closely. Pakistan, one of only nine probable nuclear states, is in a state of flux, perhaps disintegration, that bodes ill for both its neighbors and the whole of central Asia if that disintegration occurs. Less than two weeks ago, someone tried to shoot down Gen. Pervez Musharraf's plane (while he was in it), perhaps the third attempt to assassinate him in as many years. His effort to both fire and bring charges of misconduct against the highest judicial official in the country, Chief Justice Iftikar Mohammed Chaudrey, backfired when the high court both dismissed the charges and reinstated Chaudrey. The violent quelling of the Red Mosque takeover recently, several recent bombings and a wave of protests against Musharraf's continued holding of both the military leadership and the Presidency has put his regime on shaky ground. In addition, the collapse of a government-Taliban agreement about both the tribal areas and Waziristan, and a series of clashes between government troops and the taliban in Waziristan, plus an ongoing revolt in Baluchistan of a low-level nature but unceasing, has put the regime of Musharraf very much on the defensive. Friday evening I saw a discussion on the Lehrer news hour about this situation, and the general concensus about the situation seemed reasonably sound - three pronounced factions are in play here - the military, civil servants and moderates, and fundamentalists/Islamicists/Taliban. The civil servants and moderates, the socalled "hope of the nation," priorly had supported the military, but one analyst suggested that this group was shifting to an alliance with the religious groups, and that even if the military that produced Musharraf deposes him, and replaces him with another general, that these two groups are poised to cause great unrest. With both the southwest of the country (Baluchistan) and the northeast (the tribal areas and Waziristan) in turmoil, plus bombings in both Islamabad and Karachi, more repressive behavior by the miltary and a resurgence of Taliban activity, especially in the northeast and along the Afghani border, the country is a powder keg probably on the verge of exploding. What apparently has Western analysts most worried is the potential if disintegration *does* occur is the strong possibility of one or more of Pakistan's approximately forty nuclear weapons falling into the hands of extremists or out and out terrorists. In addition, those of us who believe bin Laden in still alive seem to feel that he is somewhere in Waziristan, where Pakistani troops have only the barest of projectible control. This would seem a volatile mix, regardless of where such a weapon was used. It *would* be used if Musharraf falls and the military cannot maintain control, which seems more and more likely if events in recent weeks continue or accelerate. Also if Pakistan *does* collapse or implode, Afghanistan would have both a horde of refugees crossing the border into their mess, and a host of more fighters to strengthen the Taliban within Afghanistan. The warlordism that has plagued the latter would probably be a bane to any succeeding central regime in Islamabad, providing that one could be formed if the various factions go nuts. Corruption is as endemic in Pakistan as it is in China or Russia, "bad people" getting their hands on a nuclear device seems well within the realm of possibility for such a group. They also struggle with the dichotomy of wanting US military aid, plus fiercely *not* wanting US troops on the ground there (which would probably only stir up even more violence). Musharraf is caught between turbulence, a desire for order, and a great deal of dissatisfaction with his eight year rule as a dictator, albeit allowing some level of democracy. It would appear his days in power will be numbered in weeks or months at best, and will his successors, whoever they are, be as amenable to fighting Al Qaeda and the Taliban and/or being "friendly" with the US as Musharraf has? Can they maintain security of their nuclear arsenal if extremists seize power? What will America do if they lose Pakistani support in "the war on terror" or Pakistan collapses? VMS Note: Written Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:39:26 Partially edited as of 20 August, 2007
|
| An online community for VAL-L subscribers |