<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel>
<title>VAL-L</title>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:25:57 -0600</pubDate>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/</link>
<description>PostNuke Powered Site</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<webMaster>cdel&#108;&#064;&#101;arthlink.net</webMaster>
<item>
<title>Pat Enright Dell 1944-2008</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2274</link>
<description>The mother of my sons James and Christopher
lost her fight against cancer this a.m. She had
battled for five years, and only in the last couple
of weeks did it gain an edge on her. Although we
were divorced 35 years ago, we had managed to
be friends these past twenty years even though
I rarely ever saw her.

</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:25:57 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Whispered Curses, Secret Invocations...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2273</link>
<description>A small clippit for the rest of the universe....</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:23:44 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>_The World Without Us ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2272</link>
<description>





_The World Without Us, written by Alan
Weisman, was published 1 September, and
I had acquired and read it by 7 September
after hearing Weisman interviewed that
day on NPR's &quot;Talk of the Nation.&quot; The
book is a fascinating look at what would
happen to houses, nuclear plants, cities,
forests, fauna, climate, the oceans, bronze,
petro-chemical complexes and plastics,
amongst even more than that,  over time
(stretching out to three or four million
years for plastics and the 441 nuclear
power plants extant in the world).

</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:06:57 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russia #35 (second series)</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2271</link>
<description>





President Putin's dismissal of his entire
government just under three months
before parliamentary elections on 2
December is eerily like Yeltsin's 
manuevers in his last years in office. 
His choice for Prime Minister was 
startling to both Russian political
insiders and observers of the Russian
political scene outside the Federation -
one Viktor Zubkov, presently the head
of the agency that investigates money
laundering (hard to say how well he's
been at *that* job, as a sizable amount
of money coming out of Russia is
laundered somewhere by somebody).

</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:04:41 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bush to Iraq, Cost Benefit?</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2270</link>
<description>





I read this morning that President Bush
had made his third visit to Iraq, and it
imeediately struck me, how much did that
cost the American taxpayer? One has to
think that such a visit runs into millions
of dollars in costs, mostly for security,
to what end? Such a visit gives the
pResident a platform to continue his
fallacious reasoning that the war is
going well? His visit will buoy up troop
morale? Is that worth the costs involved?</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:01:36 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Postulating About Iran, Again ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2269</link>
<description>




Over the months of this year and last, 
I've taken a fair amount of heat for 
repeating stories by a variety of folks 
about US (and/or Israeli) plans to get 
at Iran by one process or another, 
usually ending with those critics 
blasting the source as full of so much 
bushwa. I saw another one today
out of the Sunday Times (UK) by a lady 
named Sarah Baxter claiming that the 
US Pentagon had a plan that they 
weren't too far from activating to
destroy in 1200 similtaneous sorties 
over three days *every* military 
installation in Iran.</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:59:24 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Iraq Once Again ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2268</link>
<description>




Yesterday, bitter fighting broke out in 
Karbala, one of the Shiite &quot;holy cities&quot; 
presently full of several &quot;hundreds of 
thousands&quot; of pilgrims. Apparently, 
from fragmentary reports both 
yesterday and today, the clashes were
started by a tussle between members of 
Muqtada al Sadr's Mahdi Army and 
members of the Badr Brigade, a rival 
Shiite militia. The fighting reportedly
spread quickly, not only in Karbala with 
at least fifty plus killed, but elsewhere in 
the country, most notably in Baghdad. 
This morning, al Sadr reportedly 
&quot;commanded&quot; his militia to &quot;stand down&quot; 
for six months, although whether this 
will really happen remains in doubt. The 
leaders of the Badr Brigade, whoever 
they are, made no such call.

</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:55:08 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Afterthought on Iraq ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2267</link>
<description>





The bombing last Tuesday against the
Yazidi minority that killed 400-500 has
been described by some commentators
as Al Qaeda's &quot;last gasp,&quot; and an
&quot;act of desperation,&quot; and this writer
believes that could be a misreading of
what happened. I do not believe that
either the insurgency, Al Qaeda or
the various militias are&quot;'weaker,&quot;
despite losses that I know have
occurred.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:06:45 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Another Look at the &quot;Good News From Iraq&quot; Reports ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2266</link>
<description>





My friends on the American right continue
to insist that the war in Iraq is going well.
However, there are certain signs that 
continue to make me wonder how true 
that it is in the larger scheme of things.

The New York Times is reporting today 
that al-Maliki has lost considerable support 
from the &quot;Sunni bloc,&quot; his Shiite allies, the 
tribal leadership, and the Kurds. He is also
reported to be quite &quot;paranoid.&quot; The last
leaders I've heard described in that manner
were the late Shah of Iran, Fidel Castro,
Hugo Chavez, the late Mao Zedong and 
the late Joseph Stalin - not exactly sterling
company. It also suggests that very few
actually support the guy.
</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:03:40 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Elvis is Dead! Elvis is Dead!&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2265</link>
<description>





This was the breathless report from a local reporter
in Lincoln NE thirty years ago this afternoon, which 
is where I was living when Elvis' death was reported. 
I was both shocked and saddened by the news, 
especially when it was reported he had died of a 
drug overdose. I didn't know that much about his 
personal life, although musician friends had reported 
that he lived as much on the edge as the Rolling 
Stones, and I knew that he was tremendously 
overweight but didn't know why. *The* pop singer 
of my youth was gone, and he wasn't much over 
40 when he died. What a waste.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:59:22 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russia #34 (second series)</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2264</link>
<description>





The claim last week by a Russian submarine 
to “own” the Arctic Ocean, and the North Pole, 
plus Russia's stated renewal of flying military 
missions with airplanes in both a “spying” and 
“offensive mode” posture are both worrisome 
and deplorable. One nation cannot claim a 
whole ocean or region, and the Arctic should 
have the same status as the Antarctic – shared 
by everyone, owned by no one, agreed upon by 
treaty amongst all the nations of the planet.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:55:03 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hiroshima Revisited ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2263</link>
<description>





Japan affirmed again today its 
committment to being a non-nuclear 
state as it commemorated the 62nd 
anniversary of the atomic bombing 
of Hiroshima. This event killed about 
150,000 people in almost an instant, 
and is now pretty much forgotten 
save by the historians and the
Japanese.

</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 12:50:53 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Opposing Views of Iraq ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2262</link>
<description>





I have spent the past day or so meditating
on how it is that some of us can see Iraq
as being a better situation while others of
us are fairly pessimistic - and I think I've
arrived at a partial answer. Mr. Smant 
and others on POLITICS see the surge as
having lowered the incidence of violence,
reconstruction having partially worked,
and more bad guys killed. I think of this
as &quot;the military outlook.&quot; I don't know
about the reconstruction part, but other
reports would indicate *some* progress
militarily. I'm not as optimistic about
that as my friends to the farther right
but would concede a small amount of
military steps forward.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:31:20 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Iraq's Electricity Situation ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2261</link>
<description>





While I can agree that American casualties 
are down from the previous three months,
and by *some* accounts sectarian murders 
are down, there are still some really critical 
things not working very well in Iraq besides 
the malfunctioning government. One of these 
according to AP is the electrical grid. The grid 
is &quot;on the brink of collapse because of 
insurgent sabotage, rising demand, fuel 
shortages and provinces that are unplugging
local power stations from the national grid,&quot; 
local officials reported Saturday.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:26:37 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Iraq, Iran and Saudi Arabia et al ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2260</link>
<description>





The Washington Post reporter Robin Wright,
a fairly knowledgable soul on Middle Eastern
affairs, wrote a piece yesterday that 
discusses in some detail a complex arms 
deal from the United States that is proposed 
to give some $20 billion to Saudi Arabia, 
Oman, Qatar, Kuwait, the United Arab
Emirates, and Bahrain that includes 
&quot;advanced satellite-guided bombs, fighter 
aircraft upgrades and new naval vessels&quot; 
to these six nations in an effort &quot;to contain 
Iran.&quot; Congressional reaction is reported to 
be &quot;mixed,&quot; while the administration 
&quot;cautions&quot; that this is part of an even larger 
deal stretching over ten years that would 
also give $30 billion in military aid to Israel 
and $13 billion to Egypt.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:23:08 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Russia, #33 (corrected) (second series)</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2259</link>
<description>





Russia appears on a course that grows in
hostility towards the West, and leans to
greater and greater authoritarianism and
militarism at home. Many analyses seem
to suggest that Russia's boom in oil wealth
has brought about their willingness to
re-arm, as they announced two weeks ago
that they would resume production of
heavy weapons - tanks, planes, artillery
and helicopter gunships &quot;without limits.&quot;
At the same time, they renounced the CFE
treaty limiting conventional forces, and,
presumably, plan a big buildup in this
direction also.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:17:52 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Pakistan ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2258</link>
<description>





Here's a place in the world most of us, 
myself included, have not given much 
attention to and, in light of recent events, 
that perhaps we should be watching 
more closely. Pakistan, one of only
nine probable nuclear states, is in a 
state of flux, perhaps disintegration, 
that bodes ill for both its neighbors and 
the whole of central Asia if that
disintegration occurs.</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:13:50 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Al-Maliki's Claim ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2257</link>
<description>





Nouri al-Maliki, Iraq's beleaguered Prime
Minister, announced Saturday that US
troops could leave &quot;at any time&quot; and
Iraq's police and military could maintain
the country's security. I suggest without
attempting to malign the PM that he is
operating under a great delusion, or just
chooses not to recognize that without
those American troops he would
probably be dead within days. I suggest
that al-Maliki's government only has
nominal control of *parts* of Baghdad,
*parts* of some regions of the country,
and that &quot;control&quot; is weak at best.
</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:14:11 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Iraqi Police: Friend or Foe, or Both?</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2256</link>
<description>





Yesterday I was watching the network (NBC)
news, something I don't do a lot, but they had
a feature piece about the Iraqi police complete
with an animated reconstruction of how the
incident early yesterday occurred. It buttressed
what I had been saying for months about not
knowing, really, who is on what side in Iraq.</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:10:30 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>A reply to &quot;why the surge is working&quot; (POLITICS)</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2255</link>
<description>





&quot;- Deaths caused by sectarian violence 
in Iraq are down 75 percent from January 
to June&quot; (quote from post on POLITICS by 
K. Smant 7/11/07)


</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:05:08 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Wise Family Band at Fiddler's Dream, 7 July, 2007</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2254</link>
<description>





My companion, her daughter and I heard a great
little band from western Australia on the 7th at a
venue I only get to visit once in awhile - a small
coffeehouse called Fiddler's Dream on the
grounds of the Phoenix Friend's Meeting in
the southeast part of town. There weren't but a
couple of empty seats, and the audience,
some 50-60 strong, really flowed with this group.

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:56:26 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>On Spiritual Places ... (*quite* long!)</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2253</link>
<description>





I've been to a number of places that I would
consider spiritual places - my late father's
place in Virginia, the rain forest on the Olympic
Peninsula that Renny and I visited in 1999 (and
the Pacific beach at Ocean Shores Washington),
the Grand Canyon with my then-wife and three
children in 1991, Yosemite National Park with
Renny last week, the redwood forest with 
Renny also in 1998, the property of my father's 
friend M. Chandler that we camped on from 
1954 to 1961 outside of Waterford MI, Waterford 
Lake in Michigan where I once spent a blissful 
day on a boat with a childhood friend in the late
1950s, Port Sanilac MI where my late Uncle
Harry had a cabin right next to Lake Huron
that I spent one weekend at in 1959, the Rose
Garden in Kansas City that I've spent many a
happy hour in throughout the 1970s through
the 1990s (and the Park - Loose Park - that
encloses that garden), Oak Creek Canyon in
northern Arizona, the Arboretum in Ann
Arbor that I visited several times in 1966-1967,
the San Fransisco Arboretum that I visited in
1967 and again in 1995, the Friend's Meeting
House in Ann Arbor in the fall and winter of
1966-67, Kolomenskaya in Moscow in 1993,
a cave in southern Missouri I went to with
two of the Testerman brothers (one from Joplin,
now deceased, and the other from KC) and two
of their friends in 1985 and sometimes, but not
always (my flaw, not the place's) the Friend's
Meeting House in Phoenix AZ that I've been
going to since 2002 or so.  All of them
profoundly affected me at the time, and many
continue to do so now despite a distance in
time and space..

</description>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 14:53:19 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Book - Commander in Chief ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2252</link>
<description>





The full title is _Commander in Chief: 
How Truman, Johnson and Bush Turned a
Presidential Power Into a Threat to America's
Future by Geoffrey Perret (2007). Perret 
has written books about Grant, MacArthur,
Eisenhower and then Lincoln in his role as
commander-in-chief, and now this book
about three of our more modern presidents
in that same role.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 22:00:30 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Vice President's Claims About Where He Belongs ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2251</link>
<description>






Although we were away this last week, 
I heard bits and snippets about the Vice 
President's alleged claim that he is not 
part of the executive branch, although 
most of his constitutional functions save 
for a single line in Article One, Section 3 
wherein it says, &quot;The Vice President of 
the United States shall be President of
the Senate, but shall have no Vote, 
unless they be equally divided&quot; are in 
Article Two, considered the executive 
article by most constitutional scholars. 
What seems to me to be a part and 
parcel of the tying of the VP to the 
executive branch, along with 
Amendments XII and XXV, and 
specifically sections 1 and 4 of Article 
Two of the Constitution (the so-called 
&quot;executive branch&quot; section), is a line 
that follows the above line from Article 
1, Section 3, which is as follows, &quot;The 
Senate shall chuse their other officers, 
and also a President pro tempore, in the 
absence of  the Vice President, or 
when he shall exercise the Office of 
President of the United States.&quot; So, is he 
an &quot;employee&quot; of the legislative branch 
or the executive branch?
</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:55:51 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The 1964 Civil Rights Act ...</title>
<link>http://www.val-l.net/index.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=2250</link>
<description>




This law passed in the Senate 43 years old 
today. It took a lot of doing for this piece of 
legislation to emerge, as I discovered reading 
the legislative history earlier today. I know a 
few on the POLITICS list still believe the law 
to be unconstitutional, although SCOTUS 
doesn't agree with them.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:48:51 -0600</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

